VS
Insight Assurance vs CodeAnt AI
Insight Assurance is an annual compliance pentest firm. Whereas, CodeAnt AI is the Autonomous Pentesting Platform with continuous testing, proven exploits, and audit evidence.
[ The honest read ]
Where each one fits
Where Insight Assurance fits
The attestation, bundled
If your main need is the attestation itself, a SOC, ISO, or PCI engagement where the pentest is one required control, and you want it all under one licensed CPA and QSA firm, Insight Assurance bundles that cleanly.
Where CodeAnt fits
Continuous proof, with the report as a byproduct
If you want continuous proof your apps aren't exploitable, with the compliance evidence produced as a byproduct and priced on results, that's CodeAnt.
Delivery model
Why CodeAnt AI is different
Invoiced only on a real finding
You're billed only when a real critical or high lands. No credits, no minimums, no annual lock-in.
Every exploit maps to a line
Every exploit maps to the exact line that caused it, with a clear fix path.
Audit-grade, fast
Audit-grade, mapped to SOC 2 and ISO 27001. No waiting.
A real research track record
Real zero-days, real codebases. The track record speaks for itself.
Depth and evidence
Security first design built for enterprises
FAQs
How is CodeAnt different from Insight Assurance?
Does a CodeAnt pentest satisfy SOC 2 and ISO 27001?
Is an annual compliance pentest enough?
Does CodeAnt provide evidence of exploitation?
Can I use CodeAnt with my existing compliance auditor?
