VS
Doyensec vs CodeAnt AI
Doyensec is a boutique that hand-audits one target. Whereas, CodeAnt AI is the Autonomous Pentesting Platform with code-aware depth, release-by-release testing, and no waitlist.
[ The honest read ]
Where each one fits
Where Doyensec fits
A deep, one-time
manual audit
If you need a once-a-year deep manual audit of a complex app, GraphQL, Electron, an LLM-based system, by researchers who invent attack classes for a living, and you can plan the booking ahead, Doyensec is a serious choice for that job.
Where CodeAnt fits
Continuous
code-aware testing
If you need that surface tested every time you ship, with proof of exploitability and a report in 48 hours priced on results, CodeAnt is built for the cadence boutiques can't match.
Delivery model
Why CodeAnt AI is different
Invoiced only on a real finding
You're billed only when a real critical or high lands. No credits, no minimums, no annual lock-in.
Every exploit maps to a line
Every exploit maps to the exact line that caused it, with a clear fix path.
Audit-grade, fast
Audit-grade, mapped to SOC 2 and ISO 27001. No waiting.
A real research track record
Real zero-days, real codebases. The track record speaks for itself.
Depth and evidence
Security first design built for enterprises
FAQs
How is CodeAnt different from Doyensec?
Is Doyensec's manual testing deeper than CodeAnt?
How long until I get results?
Does CodeAnt read source code like Doyensec?
Does CodeAnt find exposed credentials and sessions?
