/

CVE-2026-97363

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.5)

Missing Rate Limiting (CWE-307) in WebSocket Application API

CVE-2026-97363

Awaiting Analysis

Vulnerability type

Category:

Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

CWE:

CWE-307

Impact:

Denial of Service and Unauthorized Access

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.5)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

The WebSocket API does not sufficiently limit authentication requests, allowing repeated attempts against an authentication endpoint or connection flow. An attacker who can reach the service may abuse this weakness to cause resource exhaustion or perform brute-force attempts against user credentials.

Affected context

The issue may affect WebSocket deployments that process authentication requests without effective rate limits, backoff controls, or account-level protections. Risk is higher when the authentication flow is externally reachable and credentials or tokens can be tested repeatedly without meaningful friction.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: WebSocket authentication or connection-establishment requests
  • Required access: Network reachability to the relevant WebSocket service; valid credentials are not necessarily required
  • Trigger point: Repeated authentication attempts sent through the WebSocket API
  • Why exploitation is possible: The service may accept excessive authentication requests without adequately limiting request frequency, source, account, or connection resources

Why this happens

The underlying weakness is the absence of effective controls on repeated authentication attempts. This maps to CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts, where an authentication mechanism permits repeated guesses or requests without sufficient throttling, lockout, backoff, or equivalent safeguards. The same unrestricted request path may also consume connection, CPU, memory, or downstream authentication resources.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may perform credential or token brute-force attempts
  • Unauthorized account access could occur if authentication secrets are guessed
  • The service could experience degraded availability or denial of service
  • Downstream identity or session-management systems may be overloaded

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally focuses on applying layered limits to authentication activity and reducing the value of repeated guesses.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Enforcing per-account, per-identity, per-source, and global request limits
  • Applying progressive delays, exponential backoff, or temporary challenges after failures
  • Limiting concurrent WebSocket connections and authentication work
  • Using strong, short-lived credentials or tokens with secure validation
  • Avoiding detailed authentication error messages that reveal account state
  • Applying least privilege to authenticated sessions and service identities
  • Monitoring and restricting abusive sources through gateways or policy controls
  • Preserving availability with bounded queues, timeouts, and resource budgets

How teams detect issues like this

Detection approaches may include:

  • Static analysis and code review for authentication handlers without throttling, backoff, or attempt counters
  • Inspection of WebSocket middleware and gateway policies for connection and message-rate controls
  • Tests that verify limits across accounts, sources, connections, and distributed request paths
  • Runtime monitoring for repeated failures, unusual connection churn, and authentication bursts
  • Policy enforcement requiring rate limits and alerting thresholds for externally reachable authentication services
  • Neutral automated security review tools that identify missing brute-force protections or unbounded request processing

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-274-02.json
cisa.govcisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-274-02

Frequently asked

questions

It may be remotely exploitable when the WebSocket authentication service is network-accessible and accepts repeated requests from an attacker-controlled client.

Not necessarily. Brute-force attempts can be made without valid credentials, although unauthorized access generally depends on guessing or obtaining an accepted credential or token.

Apply layered rate limits and progressive backoff to authentication requests, while also bounding WebSocket connections, processing time, and resource consumption.

Treat authentication throttling as a required security control, test it across distributed clients and alternate connection paths, and continuously monitor failed-attempt patterns and resource usage.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.