/

CVE-2026-82044

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.7)

Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in UTMStack API

CVE-2026-82044

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

Server-Side Request Forgery

CWE:

CWE-918

Impact:

Internal Resource Access and Sensitive Data Disclosure

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.7)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

UTMStack contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its PDF report generation service. An authenticated attacker may supply a crafted URL to make the server request internal services, potentially exposing sensitive data through the generated PDF.

Affected context

The vulnerability affects UTMStack deployments where the PDF report endpoint is reachable by authenticated users and the supplied URL is passed to the web-pdf microservice without sufficient validation. Risk is higher when the service can reach internal backend endpoints, OpenSearch, or cloud instance-metadata services from its network position.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: The authenticated GET /api/generate-pdf-report endpoint
  • Required access: A valid authenticated account able to request PDF reports
  • Trigger point: The url parameter processed by PdfService.downloadPdf()
  • Why exploitation is possible: The server makes outbound requests based on attacker-controlled URL input without adequately restricting destinations, protocols, or network ranges

Why this happens

The underlying flaw is server-side request forgery, mapped to CWE-918. The application treats a user-controlled URL as a trusted fetch target and performs the request from a privileged server-side network position. Without robust destination validation, attackers may redirect requests toward internal services that are not directly exposed to them.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may retrieve sensitive content from internal backend endpoints
  • OpenSearch data or administrative interfaces could be exposed
  • Cloud instance-metadata responses could disclose credentials or deployment information
  • Internal network topology and service details could be revealed
  • Sensitive responses may be rendered into downloadable PDF reports

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally focuses on reducing trust in user-supplied URLs and constraining server-side network access.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Allowing requests only to an explicit, tightly controlled destination allowlist
  • Restricting supported schemes, ports, redirects, and resolved IP addresses
  • Blocking loopback, link-local, private, reserved, and metadata-service address ranges
  • Revalidating destinations after DNS resolution and across redirects
  • Separating report-fetching services from sensitive internal networks
  • Applying least-privilege identity and network policies to the web-pdf microservice
  • Avoiding the inclusion of fetched content unless its origin and content type are verified

How teams detect issues like this

High-level detection can combine application review, runtime monitoring, and policy enforcement:

  • Use static analysis to identify HTTP clients receiving URL values from request parameters
  • Review code paths involving PDF generation, URL fetching, redirect handling, and DNS resolution
  • Monitor outbound requests from report-generation services to private, loopback, link-local, and metadata addresses
  • Enforce egress network policies that limit service-to-service and external destinations
  • Alert on unusual report-generation requests, repeated URL changes, or responses containing internal service markers
  • Use automated security review tools to flag SSRF-prone data flows for manual validation

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/UTMStack/UTMStack/releases/tag/v11.2.16
github.comgithub.com/utmstack/UTMStack/commit/4e7a727c3b8d8e2ad020d3b4f982a6d085dbecdd
vulncheck.comvulncheck.com/advisories/utmstack-server-side-request-forgery-via-downloadpdf

Frequently asked

questions

Yes, it can be exploited through the exposed report-generation endpoint, but the attacker generally needs authenticated access and the service must have network reachability to the requested internal resource.

The attacker needs a valid account with permission to invoke PDF report generation and influence the endpoint's url parameter.

Use an explicit destination allowlist, reject private and metadata-service address ranges, constrain protocols and ports, and validate destinations after DNS resolution and redirects.

Treat all user-controlled URLs as untrusted, apply strict egress controls, isolate fetch services from sensitive networks, and continuously monitor outbound requests from server-side rendering components.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.