/

CVE-2026-65145

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(10.0)

Missing Authentication (CWE-306) in NVIDIA NeMo Toolkit

CVE-2026-65145

Awaiting Analysis

Vulnerability type

Category:

Missing Authentication

CWE:

CWE-306

Impact:

Unauthorized access with potential code execution, privilege escalation, data compromise, and service disruption

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(10.0)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit contains a missing authentication vulnerability that may allow an attacker to access protected functionality without proving identity. Depending on the exposed interface and deployment permissions, this could enable code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, denial of service, or information disclosure.

NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit contains a missing authentication vulnerability that may allow an attacker to access protected functionality without proving identity. Depending on the exposed interface and deployment permissions, this could enable code execution, privilege escalation, data tampering, denial of service, or information disclosure.

Affected context

The vulnerability may affect deployments of NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit where security-sensitive endpoints, agent actions, or management interfaces are reachable without effective authentication. Risk depends on network exposure, enabled toolkit capabilities, authorization boundaries, and the privileges available to the affected service.

The vulnerability may affect deployments of NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit where security-sensitive endpoints, agent actions, or management interfaces are reachable without effective authentication. Risk depends on network exposure, enabled toolkit capabilities, authorization boundaries, and the privileges available to the affected service.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: An exposed NeMo Agent Toolkit service, endpoint, or agent capability - Required access: Network reachability or another path to the affected interface; valid credentials may not be required - Trigger point: A request or interaction with functionality that should require authentication - Why exploitation is possible: The affected operation does not adequately verify the caller's identity before processing a security-sensitive action
  • Attack surface: An exposed NeMo Agent Toolkit service, endpoint, or agent capability - Required access: Network reachability or another path to the affected interface; valid credentials may not be required - Trigger point: A request or interaction with functionality that should require authentication - Why exploitation is possible: The affected operation does not adequately verify the caller's identity before processing a security-sensitive action

Why this happens

The underlying flaw is an absent or ineffective authentication check on a protected functionality. This maps to CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function, where the application performs a sensitive operation without first establishing that the requester is an authorized identity. Authentication and authorization boundaries may therefore be bypassed, allowing unauthenticated requests to reach capabilities intended for trusted users or services.

The underlying flaw is an absent or ineffective authentication check on a protected functionality. This maps to CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function, where the application performs a sensitive operation without first establishing that the requester is an authorized identity. Authentication and authorization boundaries may therefore be bypassed, allowing unauthenticated requests to reach capabilities intended for trusted users or services.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may execute code through exposed agent or service capabilities
  • An attacker could obtain privileges associated with the affected process
  • Sensitive information may be disclosed
  • Application or connected data may be modified or tampered with
  • The service may be disrupted or rendered unavailable
  • The vulnerable component could be used as a foothold for broader compromise
  • An attacker may execute code through exposed agent or service capabilities
  • An attacker could obtain privileges associated with the affected process
  • Sensitive information may be disclosed
  • Application or connected data may be modified or tampered with
  • The service may be disrupted or rendered unavailable
  • The vulnerable component could be used as a foothold for broader compromise

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally focuses on ensuring that every security-sensitive endpoint and agent action has an explicit authentication and authorization boundary. Use secure-by-default configurations that deny unauthenticated access, require strong identity verification, and apply least-privilege service accounts and tool permissions. Reduce trust in network location alone, restrict management interfaces to approved networks, separate high-risk agent capabilities, and avoid exposing execution-oriented functionality directly to untrusted callers. Centralized policy enforcement and defense-in-depth controls can limit impact if an authentication check is missed.

Mitigation generally focuses on ensuring that every security-sensitive endpoint and agent action has an explicit authentication and authorization boundary. Use secure-by-default configurations that deny unauthenticated access, require strong identity verification, and apply least-privilege service accounts and tool permissions. Reduce trust in network location alone, restrict management interfaces to approved networks, separate high-risk agent capabilities, and avoid exposing execution-oriented functionality directly to untrusted callers. Centralized policy enforcement and defense-in-depth controls can limit impact if an authentication check is missed.

How teams detect issues like this

Review service routes, agent tools, and management operations for sensitive actions that lack middleware or policy-based authentication checks. Static analysis and code review should flag request handlers that invoke privileged functionality without an authenticated principal or explicit authorization decision. Test unauthenticated requests against all externally reachable interfaces, inspect gateway and identity-provider policies, and enforce deployment rules that prevent public exposure of administrative or execution endpoints. Automated security review tools may help identify inconsistent authentication coverage.

Review service routes, agent tools, and management operations for sensitive actions that lack middleware or policy-based authentication checks. Static analysis and code review should flag request handlers that invoke privileged functionality without an authenticated principal or explicit authorization decision. Test unauthenticated requests against all externally reachable interfaces, inspect gateway and identity-provider policies, and enforce deployment rules that prevent public exposure of administrative or execution endpoints. Automated security review tools may help identify inconsistent authentication coverage.

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5912
nvd.nist.govnvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-65145
cve.orgcve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65145

Frequently asked

questions

It may be remotely exploitable when the affected NeMo Agent Toolkit interface is network-accessible and does not require authentication. Actual scope depends on deployment exposure and enabled capabilities.

The defining issue is that a protected function may be reachable without properly authenticated credentials. Network access or another route to the exposed interface may still be necessary.

Require authentication before processing sensitive requests, then apply explicit authorization checks and least-privilege permissions to each operation.

Maintain centralized identity and policy enforcement, test unauthenticated access paths in CI and deployment reviews, and keep administrative and code-execution capabilities isolated from untrusted networks.

It may be remotely exploitable when the affected NeMo Agent Toolkit interface is network-accessible and does not require authentication. Actual scope depends on deployment exposure and enabled capabilities.

The defining issue is that a protected function may be reachable without properly authenticated credentials. Network access or another route to the exposed interface may still be necessary.

Require authentication before processing sensitive requests, then apply explicit authorization checks and least-privilege permissions to each operation.

Maintain centralized identity and policy enforcement, test unauthenticated access paths in CI and deployment reviews, and keep administrative and code-execution capabilities isolated from untrusted networks.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.