/

CVE-2026-18958

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

SQL Injection (CWE-89) in Student-Management LoginCheck

CVE-2026-18958

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

SQL Injection

CWE:

CWE-74, CWE-89

Impact:

Potential unauthorized database access, authentication bypass, data disclosure, or data modification

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

A SQL injection vulnerability in the Student-Management-System login component allows remotely supplied username or password values to influence database queries. An attacker who can reach the login endpoint may be able to read, alter, or interfere with database data when those values are incorporated into SQL without safe parameter handling.

Affected context

The issue occurs in the Login functionality implemented by loginCheckTest.php when request-supplied username or password values are used in database operations. Risk is present when the application accepts remote login requests and constructs SQL statements from those values without reliable parameterization or equivalent query-safety controls. The affected project does not provide conventional release versioning, so exposure should be assessed against the deployed source revision and configuration.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: The remotely accessible Login endpoint
  • Required access: Network access to submit login requests; prior authentication is not generally expected for the login operation
  • Trigger point: Processing of the username or password arguments by loginCheckTest.php
  • Why exploitation is possible: User-controlled values may be interpreted as SQL syntax when query construction does not separate data from database commands

Why this happens

The underlying bug is an injection flaw in which externally controlled authentication fields are incorporated into SQL statements without strict separation between data and query logic. This maps primarily to CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (SQL Injection) and more broadly to CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component. The insecure pattern typically involves string concatenation or interpolation instead of parameterized database queries.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may bypass intended authentication checks.
  • Sensitive database records could be disclosed.
  • Database contents could be modified or deleted.
  • Application availability could be affected through database misuse.
  • Compromised records could support further attacks against users or connected systems.

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally centers on making database queries safe by default and reducing trust in request parameters.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements for every user-controlled value.
  • Avoid constructing SQL through string concatenation or interpolation.
  • Apply allowlist-based validation appropriate to each field's expected format.
  • Use database accounts with only the permissions required by the login workflow.
  • Keep authentication and database error responses sufficiently generic to limit information disclosure.
  • Treat validation as supplemental protection rather than a replacement for query parameterization.

How teams detect issues like this

Detection approaches may include:

  • Static analysis for SQL statements assembled with request parameters.
  • Code review checks for string concatenation or interpolation near database calls.
  • Dynamic testing of login inputs using safe, controlled injection probes.
  • Database and application logging for anomalous authentication queries or repeated malformed requests.
  • Policy enforcement requiring prepared statements or approved database-access abstractions.
  • Neutral automated review tools can help identify tainted data flows from HTTP parameters into SQL execution APIs.

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/winterbergnurullah551-sketch/sql-cves/issues/1
vuldb.comvuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-18958
vuldb.comvuldb.com/submit/860107
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/386233
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/386233/cti

Frequently asked

questions

Yes. The reported attack surface is the remotely accessible Login functionality, although actual exposure depends on network reachability and deployment controls.

Not necessarily. Because the affected functionality is a login check, an attacker may only need access to submit requests to the endpoint; the exact outcome depends on application behavior and database permissions.

Use prepared statements or parameterized queries for all values derived from request input, with field-specific validation as an additional control.

Enforce secure database-access patterns through code review, static analysis, testing, least-privilege database accounts, and policies that prohibit dynamic SQL construction from untrusted input.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.