/

CVE-2026-104069

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.2)

Unrestricted File Upload (CWE-434) in HortusFox Themes

CVE-2026-104069

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

Unrestricted File Upload

CWE:

CWE-434

Impact:

Remote Code Execution

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.2)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

HortusFox contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in its theme import functionality, where uploaded ZIP archives are extracted into the public web root before their contents are validated. An authenticated administrator may abuse this behavior to place executable server-side files in a web-accessible directory and potentially run operating system commands as the web-server user.

HortusFox contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in its theme import functionality, where uploaded ZIP archives are extracted into the public web root before their contents are validated. An authenticated administrator may abuse this behavior to place executable server-side files in a web-accessible directory and potentially run operating system commands as the web-server user.

Affected context

The vulnerability occurs in deployments using HortusFox's theme import feature when:

  • An authenticated administrator can upload a theme archive
  • The archive is extracted directly into the public web root
  • File names, extensions, and content are not validated before extraction
  • The web server can interpret uploaded server-side files as executable code

Exploitability depends on the web server configuration, archive handling behavior, and permissions available to the authenticated account.

The vulnerability occurs in deployments using HortusFox's theme import feature when:

  • An authenticated administrator can upload a theme archive
  • The archive is extracted directly into the public web root
  • File names, extensions, and content are not validated before extraction
  • The web server can interpret uploaded server-side files as executable code

Exploitability depends on the web server configuration, archive handling behavior, and permissions available to the authenticated account.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: Authenticated theme-upload functionality
  • Required access: An account with administrator privileges or equivalent permission to import themes
  • Trigger point: Extraction of an uploaded ZIP archive followed by a request for an extracted file under the themes directory
  • Why exploitation is possible: Archive contents are written into a public web location before adequate validation, allowing server-executable files to become reachable through the application
  • Attack surface: Authenticated theme-upload functionality
  • Required access: An account with administrator privileges or equivalent permission to import themes
  • Trigger point: Extraction of an uploaded ZIP archive followed by a request for an extracted file under the themes directory
  • Why exploitation is possible: Archive contents are written into a public web location before adequate validation, allowing server-executable files to become reachable through the application

Why this happens

The underlying flaw is an unrestricted file upload combined with unsafe archive extraction. The application trusts the contents of an administrator-supplied ZIP file and places them in a web-accessible directory without enforcing an allowlist for file types, validating content, or separating uploaded assets from executable server resources.

This behavior maps to CWE-434: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type, because files capable of server-side execution may be uploaded and exposed without sufficient controls.

The underlying flaw is an unrestricted file upload combined with unsafe archive extraction. The application trusts the contents of an administrator-supplied ZIP file and places them in a web-accessible directory without enforcing an allowlist for file types, validating content, or separating uploaded assets from executable server resources.

This behavior maps to CWE-434: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type, because files capable of server-side execution may be uploaded and exposed without sufficient controls.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may execute arbitrary operating system commands as the web-server user
  • The application and its hosted data could be compromised
  • Sensitive configuration files or credentials could be exposed
  • The server could be used for lateral movement or persistence
  • Uploaded content could be used to alter application behavior or distribute malicious files
  • An attacker may execute arbitrary operating system commands as the web-server user
  • The application and its hosted data could be compromised
  • Sensitive configuration files or credentials could be exposed
  • The server could be used for lateral movement or persistence
  • Uploaded content could be used to alter application behavior or distribute malicious files

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally focuses on reducing trust in uploaded archives and ensuring uploaded content cannot become executable server resources.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Extracting uploads outside the public web root or into storage that does not permit server-side execution
  • Allowing only explicitly required theme file types and rejecting executable extensions
  • Validating archive entries before extraction, including names, paths, extensions, and content
  • Preventing path traversal and unsafe archive member names
  • Applying server configuration policies that disable script execution in upload and theme asset directories
  • Storing uploaded files with generated names and serving them through controlled handlers
  • Restricting theme-import permissions and operating the web process with least privilege
  • Using resource limits and isolation for archive processing

Mitigation generally focuses on reducing trust in uploaded archives and ensuring uploaded content cannot become executable server resources.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Extracting uploads outside the public web root or into storage that does not permit server-side execution
  • Allowing only explicitly required theme file types and rejecting executable extensions
  • Validating archive entries before extraction, including names, paths, extensions, and content
  • Preventing path traversal and unsafe archive member names
  • Applying server configuration policies that disable script execution in upload and theme asset directories
  • Storing uploaded files with generated names and serving them through controlled handlers
  • Restricting theme-import permissions and operating the web process with least privilege
  • Using resource limits and isolation for archive processing

How teams detect issues like this

Detection approaches can include:

  • Static analysis rules for archive extraction into public or executable directories
  • Code review checks for missing file-type allowlists and absent archive-entry validation
  • Repository searches for upload handlers that preserve user-controlled names or extensions
  • Web-server policy checks verifying that upload and theme directories cannot execute server-side code
  • Runtime monitoring for newly created executable files beneath public theme paths
  • Audit logging and alerting for administrator theme uploads followed by requests to newly extracted files
  • Automated security review tools that identify dangerous upload and archive-processing patterns

Detection approaches can include:

  • Static analysis rules for archive extraction into public or executable directories
  • Code review checks for missing file-type allowlists and absent archive-entry validation
  • Repository searches for upload handlers that preserve user-controlled names or extensions
  • Web-server policy checks verifying that upload and theme directories cannot execute server-side code
  • Runtime monitoring for newly created executable files beneath public theme paths
  • Audit logging and alerting for administrator theme uploads followed by requests to newly extracted files
  • Automated security review tools that identify dangerous upload and archive-processing patterns

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/danielbrendel/hortusfox-web/commit/3b87393d38ce408ec6f0946ffb3cbf0d08b5f07c
github.comgithub.com/danielbrendel/hortusfox-web/releases/tag/v6.2
vulncheck.comvulncheck.com/advisories/hortusfox-remote-code-execution-via-theme-import

Frequently asked

questions

It may be exploitable through the application's web interface, but the attacker generally needs authenticated administrator-level access or equivalent theme-import permissions.

The uploaded archive must be extracted into a web-accessible location, and the relevant web-server configuration must allow an uploaded server-side file to execute.

Store uploads outside executable web roots, validate archive contents before extraction, and enforce a strict allowlist of permitted theme files.

Apply least-privilege upload permissions, isolate untrusted files from executable resources, validate archive paths and content, and continuously test web-server policies for upload directories.

It may be exploitable through the application's web interface, but the attacker generally needs authenticated administrator-level access or equivalent theme-import permissions.

The uploaded archive must be extracted into a web-accessible location, and the relevant web-server configuration must allow an uploaded server-side file to execute.

Store uploads outside executable web roots, validate archive contents before extraction, and enforce a strict allowlist of permitted theme files.

Apply least-privilege upload permissions, isolate untrusted files from executable resources, validate archive paths and content, and continuously test web-server policies for upload directories.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.