/

CVE-2026-101260

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.1)

OS Command Injection (CWE-77) in Ziroom ZHOME API

CVE-2026-101260

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-74, CWE-77

Impact:

Remote Code Execution

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.1)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

A critical command injection vulnerability affects the Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0 device through the /api/ZRnetwork/firstLogin endpoint. A remote attacker who can reach the endpoint and control the firstLogin argument may cause operating-system commands to execute in the device context.

Affected context

The issue occurs in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0 when the firstLogin parameter submitted to /api/ZRnetwork/firstLogin is incorporated into an operating-system command or shell-sensitive operation without adequate separation and validation. Risk depends on network exposure of the API, the privileges of the affected service, and whether additional authentication or access controls are enforced.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: The remotely reachable /api/ZRnetwork/firstLogin API endpoint
  • Required access: Ability to send requests to the endpoint; authentication requirements are not established by the available description
  • Trigger point: Processing of the firstLogin argument
  • Why exploitation is possible: Attacker-controlled input may be interpreted as command syntax rather than as data

Why this happens

The underlying bug is an insufficient separation between external input and operating-system command construction. When a request parameter is passed into a shell or command interpreter without strict allowlisting and safe argument handling, control characters or command syntax may alter the intended operation. This behavior maps primarily to CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command, with CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component describing the broader injection class.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may execute arbitrary commands on the affected device
  • Device configuration or stored data could be modified or deleted
  • The service account's privileges could be abused for further compromise
  • The device could be used to access connected systems or networks
  • Availability may be affected through service disruption or resource consumption

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally focuses on removing shell interpretation from request-processing paths and reducing trust in client-supplied values.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Replacing shell command construction with direct APIs that pass arguments as structured values
  • Applying strict allowlists and type validation to the firstLogin parameter
  • Avoiding dynamic command composition when a fixed operation can be implemented directly
  • Running the affected service with the minimum filesystem, process, and network privileges
  • Restricting exposure of device-management APIs through authentication, segmentation, and policy enforcement
  • Treating externally supplied values as untrusted across all downstream components

How teams detect issues like this

Detection approaches may include:

  • Static analysis for shell execution APIs, command concatenation, and string interpolation involving request parameters
  • Code review checks for endpoint arguments flowing into process-spawning or command-execution functions
  • Runtime monitoring for unexpected child processes, shell interpreters, command-line anomalies, or unusual outbound connections
  • API gateway and device logs reviewed for malformed or unexpected firstLogin values
  • Policy enforcement that prohibits shell invocation from network-facing request handlers unless explicitly justified
  • Automated security review tools configured to identify command-injection data flows

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/waltz-sketch/Ziroom/blob/main/firstlogin_command_injection.md
vuldb.comvuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-101260
vuldb.comvuldb.com/submit/914642
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/411028
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/411028/cti

Frequently asked

questions

Yes. The described attack surface is a remotely reachable API endpoint, although practical exposure depends on network accessibility and deployment controls.

The available description does not establish whether authentication is required. The key condition is the ability to reach the endpoint and supply the affected argument.

The safest pattern is to eliminate shell interpretation, use structured process APIs where an operating-system operation is unavoidable, and enforce strict allowlisted validation on the parameter.

Treat all request parameters as untrusted, apply command-injection-focused code review and static analysis, restrict service privileges, and monitor network-facing components for unexpected process execution.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.