/

CVE-2026-100315

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

SQL Injection (CWE-89) in CloudClassroom PHP Project

CVE-2026-100315

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

SQL Injection

CWE:

CWE-74, CWE-89

Impact:

Unauthorized Database Access and Data Manipulation

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

CloudClassroom-PHP-Project contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the mydetailsfaculty.php functionality through the myfid argument. Because the affected endpoint may be reachable remotely, an attacker could potentially manipulate database queries and access, alter, or disrupt application data.

Affected context

The vulnerability occurs in deployments of CloudClassroom-PHP-Project containing the affected mydetailsfaculty.php functionality. Risk is present when the remotely accessible endpoint accepts the myfid argument and incorporates its value into database queries without sufficiently separating user-controlled data from SQL syntax.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: A remotely reachable web endpoint associated with mydetailsfaculty.php
  • Required access: The ability to send requests to the affected functionality; authentication requirements may depend on deployment configuration
  • Trigger point: Processing of the myfid argument
  • Why exploitation is possible: Input may reach a database query without adequate parameterization or validation, allowing query structure to be influenced by attacker-controlled data

Why this happens

The underlying bug is an injection flaw in which externally supplied input is treated as part of a SQL statement rather than strictly as data. This maps to CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command, with CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component describing the broader injection pattern. The insecure design typically involves dynamically concatenating request values into queries instead of using parameterized database interfaces.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may retrieve unauthorized application or user data
  • An attacker could modify or delete database records
  • Database integrity may be compromised through unauthorized changes
  • Application availability could be affected by resource-intensive or destructive queries
  • Sensitive information may be exposed and used for further attacks

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally focuses on ensuring that request data cannot alter SQL query structure.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Using parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations
  • Applying allowlist validation for identifiers such as faculty IDs, including expected type and format checks
  • Avoiding string concatenation when constructing SQL statements
  • Restricting database accounts to the minimum permissions required by the application
  • Returning generic database errors to users while recording useful diagnostic details securely
  • Applying consistent input-handling and query policies across comparable endpoints

How teams detect issues like this

Organizations commonly detect SQL injection risks through:

  • Static analysis rules identifying SQL construction through string concatenation or interpolation
  • Code review checks for request parameters passed directly into database APIs
  • Dynamic testing of remotely accessible endpoints with malformed and unexpected input classes
  • Web application firewall or gateway policies that identify suspicious query-manipulation patterns
  • Database audit logs showing unusual query shapes, access patterns, or permission use

Automated code review and application security testing tools can help identify injection paths before deployment, but findings should be validated against the application's data-access design.

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/vinniboy021-blip/Advisory/blob/main/mydetailsfaculty-sqli.md
vuldb.comvuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-100315
vuldb.comvuldb.com/submit/914583
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/410443
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/410443/cti

Frequently asked

questions

Yes, the reported attack surface is remote because the affected functionality is exposed through a web application endpoint. Practical exploitability still depends on network reachability and any authentication or authorization controls around the endpoint.

An attacker needs the ability to submit requests that reach the myfid parameter. Whether an authenticated account is required depends on the deployment's access controls.

The safest pattern is to use parameterized queries or prepared statements and validate the expected type and format of the faculty identifier before database processing.

Standardize secure data-access APIs, prohibit query construction through untrusted string concatenation, apply least-privilege database permissions, and include static and dynamic injection testing in the development lifecycle.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.