/

CVE-2026-100314

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

SQL Injection (CWE-89) in CloudClassroom PHP Project

CVE-2026-100314

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

SQL Injection

CWE:

CWE-74, CWE-89

Impact:

Unauthorized database access and manipulation

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

CloudClassroom-PHP-Project contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the eno argument processed by updatedetailsfromstudent.php. A remote attacker may be able to alter database queries when the affected endpoint is reachable and input is incorporated into SQL without adequate parameterization.

Affected context

The vulnerability occurs in deployments using the affected CloudClassroom-PHP-Project code where updatedetailsfromstudent.php is remotely accessible and the eno argument reaches a database query. Risk depends on how the application constructs SQL statements, the privileges of its database account, and the protections applied at the application and database layers.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: Remotely reachable web application endpoint
  • Required access: Access sufficient to submit requests to the affected functionality; authentication requirements may depend on deployment configuration
  • Trigger point: Processing of the eno argument by updatedetailsfromstudent.php
  • Why exploitation is possible: User-controlled input may influence SQL query structure if it is concatenated into statements without parameterized query handling

Why this happens

The underlying bug is an injection flaw in which externally supplied data is treated as part of a database command rather than as a strictly bounded value. This maps primarily to CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (SQL Injection) and relates to the broader CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component classification.

Potential impact

  • An attacker may read unauthorized database records
  • An attacker could modify or delete application data
  • Database credentials or sensitive records may be exposed
  • Application availability could be affected through resource-intensive queries
  • Further compromise may be possible if the database account has excessive privileges

General mitigation guidance

Mitigation generally centers on separating data from SQL command structure and reducing the trust placed in request parameters.

Common defensive patterns include:

  • Using parameterized queries or safely designed query-builder interfaces for all database operations
  • Applying allowlisted validation and type constraints to identifiers such as eno
  • Avoiding dynamic SQL construction from request data
  • Enforcing least privilege for application database accounts
  • Limiting database network exposure and separating sensitive data stores
  • Returning generic database errors to clients while preserving detailed diagnostics in protected logs
  • Applying consistent input-handling controls across related endpoints

How teams detect issues like this

Organizations commonly detect SQL injection risks through:

  • Static analysis rules identifying string concatenation or interpolation in SQL statements
  • Code review checks for request parameters passed directly to database APIs
  • Dynamic testing of remotely reachable parameters with harmless injection-detection probes
  • Web application firewall or API policy rules for anomalous database-oriented input patterns
  • Database audit logs showing unexpected query structures, errors, or access patterns
  • Automated security review tools integrated into pull-request and CI workflows

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/vinniboy021-blip/Advisory/blob/main/updatedetailsfromstudent-sqli.md
vuldb.comvuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-100314
vuldb.comvuldb.com/submit/914582
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/410442
vuldb.comvuldb.com/vuln/410442/cti

Frequently asked

questions

Potentially. The description indicates that the affected functionality can be reached remotely, but successful exploitation also depends on endpoint exposure, authentication controls, and how the application processes eno.

Not necessarily. Authentication requirements are deployment-specific; the important condition is that an attacker can submit input to the vulnerable functionality.

Use parameterized queries or a query-builder abstraction that keeps user-controlled values separate from SQL syntax, supplemented by strict validation and least-privilege database access.

Standardize safe database access APIs, prohibit SQL construction through string concatenation, review all request-to-query data flows, and combine code scanning with runtime monitoring.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.