/

CVE-2025-69931

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

SQL Injection (CWE-89) in CodeAstro Membership System

CVE-2025-69931

Deferred

Vulnerability type

Category:

SQL Injection

CWE:

CWE-89

Impact:

Database Compromise and Data Manipulation

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

CVSS version:

3.1

Catch this CVE while code is being written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Summary

A critical SQL injection flaw in the CodeAstro Membership Management System allows attackers to manipulate database queries via the id parameter in delete_membership.php.

When user-supplied input is concatenated directly into SQL statements without proper validation or parameterization, attackers can bypass authorization checks, access sensitive data, or destroy records.

Affected context

This vulnerability occurs in the membership deletion functionality of the CodeAstro Membership Management System, specifically in the delete_membership.php endpoint.

It is typically exposed when the application accepts an id parameter from HTTP requests and uses it directly in SQL queries targeting the membership table, without employing prepared statements or input sanitization.

The issue is most relevant in deployments where the application connects to a relational database with accounts that have broad privileges over membership records and possibly related user data.

Exploit preconditions

  • Attack surface: HTTP endpoint /delete_membership.php receiving an id parameter.
  • Required access: Ability to send crafted web requests to the application (often unauthenticated or with low-privileged membership access, depending on deployment).
  • Trigger point: Execution of a SQL query that interpolates the id value directly into the WHERE clause or other parts of the statement.
  • Why exploitation is possible: The application fails to use parameterized queries and trusts raw input, allowing arbitrary SQL syntax to be injected and executed by the database engine.

Why this happens

The underlying bug is a classic SQL injection pattern described by CWE-89.

The application dynamically constructs SQL statements in PHP by concatenating user-controlled values from the id parameter into the query string.

Without prepared statements, bound parameters, or robust input validation, the database interprets the injected content as part of the query logic rather than data.

This design breaks the intended boundary between application data and SQL commands, enabling attackers to alter query behavior and impact the entire database operation.

Potential impact

  • Attackers may delete arbitrary membership records from the database.
  • Attackers could retrieve sensitive user or membership information beyond their authorization level.
  • Attackers may modify membership attributes, roles, or privileges, potentially escalating their access.
  • Attackers can corrupt or drop tables, leading to loss of service and data integrity issues.
  • In some environments, attackers could chain the issue to further compromise, such as writing server-side files via SQL functions.

General mitigation guidance

Effective mitigation focuses on separating user input from SQL command structure and reducing database privilege impact.

Common secure patterns include:

  • Using parameterized queries with bound variables for all database interactions, avoiding string concatenation.
  • Applying strict server-side validation to ensure id values are of expected type and range (e.g., integers only).
  • Implementing least-privilege database accounts so the application cannot drop tables or perform high-risk operations.
  • Centralizing data access in a well-reviewed abstraction layer that enforces safe query practices.
  • Employing defense-in-depth controls such as application-level query whitelisting or ORM frameworks that minimize direct SQL construction.

How teams detect issues like this

Organizations can detect SQL injection risks through multiple approaches:

  • Static analysis rules that flag dynamic SQL construction using concatenated variables (e.g., $sql = "DELETE ... ".$_GET['id'];).
  • Targeted code review focusing on database access layers, looking for direct use of request parameters in query strings.
  • Automated scanning tools (DAST) that send payloads to parameters like id and observe database error messages or behavioral anomalies.
  • Security policies requiring prepared statements and ORM usage, enforced via CI checks or pre-commit hooks.
  • Logging and monitoring of unusual deletion patterns or SQL errors that may indicate injection attempts.

Sources

SourceLink
github.comgithub.com/um-dsp/TaintRadar/blob/main/sql_injection_cves/codeastro/20250811-membership-management-system-delete_membership.php-id-sqli/20250811-membership-management-system-delete_membership.php-id-sqli.md

Frequently asked

questions

If the delete_membership.php endpoint is exposed to the internet and does not enforce strict access controls, it can typically be exploited remotely by anyone who can send HTTP requests to the application.

In many cases, only the ability to reach the vulnerable endpoint is required. Depending on deployment, minimal or no authentication may be needed, making it accessible to low-privileged users or even anonymous visitors.

Refactor all affected queries to use prepared statements with bound parameters, ensure that the id value is treated strictly as data, and apply type validation (e.g., integer casting) before it reaches the database layer.

Adopt secure coding standards that prohibit dynamic SQL concatenation, use an ORM or standardized data access layer, integrate static and dynamic security testing into CI pipelines, and regularly review database-related code for adherence to parameterization and least-privilege principles.

Find out what's already
exploitable in your codebase.