VS
Agentic pentesting,
billed by the repo or by the exploit.
DepthFirst charges a subscription priced on how much code you scan. CodeAnt runs autonomous, code-aware pentesting across your whole attack surface, ships a working PoC and a 48-hour audit-grade report, and you pay only when an exploit actually lands.
[ HEAD-TO-HEAD ]
Delivery model
[ THE DIFFERENCE ]
Why CodeAnt AI is different
Invoiced only on a real finding
You're billed only when a real critical or high lands. No credits, no minimums, no annual lock-in.
Every exploit maps to a line
Every exploit maps to the exact line that caused it, with a clear fix path.
Audit-grade, fast
Audit-grade, mapped to SOC 2 and ISO 27001. No waiting.
A real research track record
Real zero-days, real codebases. The track record speaks for itself.
[ HEAD TO HEAD ]
Pricing model
[ HEAD TO HEAD ]
Depth and evidence
[ SECURE & COMPLIANT ]
Security first design built for enterprises
[ The honest read ]
Where each one fits
Where DepthFirst fits
Deep agentic
analysis of your code
DepthFirst is a capable, well-backed AI-native platform. If you want deep agentic analysis of your code, supply chain, and secrets surfaced inside a developer platform with ready-to-merge fixes, on a subscription, it's a real product from a serious team.
Where CodeAnt fits
Proof across your whole surface, priced on results
If you want a pentest that proves exploitability across your whole attack surface, apps, cloud, network, and external, produces the audit-grade report your compliance program needs, and charges on results instead of codebase size, that's CodeAnt.
FAQs
How is CodeAnt different from DepthFirst for agentic pentesting?
How does DepthFirst pricing compare to CodeAnt?
Does DepthFirst produce a pentest report for auditors?
Is CodeAnt AI-native and autonomous like DepthFirst?
Does CodeAnt test more than code?
Does CodeAnt find exposed credentials and sessions?
